Supreme Court Review 2016/2017 TERM
SUNDAY, MARCH 26, 2017
CLICK HERE TO TRACK THIS CASE

Issue:  EEOC subpoena enforcement

McLane Co. v. EEOC

15-1248

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED

Whether a district court’s decision to quash or enforce an EEOC subpoena should be reviewed de novo, which only the Ninth Circuit does, or should be reviewed deferentially, which eight other circuits do, consistent with this Court’s precedents concerning the choice of standards of review.

DECISION

Fully Briefed and Argued
Awaiting Decision

ORAL ARGUMENT

Argued February 21, 2017

Appearences
On Behalf of Petitioner McLane Company, Inc.
Allyson N. Ho, Dallas, Tex.
On Behalf of Respondent Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Rachel P. Kovner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
On Behalf of Court-appointed amicus curiae
Stephen B. Kinnaird, Washington, D. C.
Transcript
pdf download
Audio
mp3 download
Merit Briefs
Brief for Court-Apponted Amicus Curiae (pdf download)
Brief for Petitioner (pdf download)
Brief for Respondent (pdf download)
Reply Brief for Petitioner (pdf download)
Reply Brief for Respondent (pdf download)
Amicus Curiae Briefs
Brief for Law Professors in Support of Petitioner (pdf download)
Brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council, Chamber Of Commerce of the United States of America And National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center in Support of Petitioner (pdf download)

CERTIORARI STAGE

Granted September 29, 2016

Certiorari Stage Documents
      (pdf download)
Petition for Certiorari (pdf download)
Brief in Opposition (pdf download)
Petitioner's Reply (pdf download)

PROCEEDING BELOW

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 27, 2015
pdf download